Muddled Process: Wycliffe Church Property Vote at City Council

The Virginia Beach City Council vote on the Wycliffe Church development was a mess. The presentation that came before the City Council was materially different from what came before the Planning Commission in March and had been altered just three days before the City Council meeting giving residents and neighborhoods almost no time to review the new proposal. In the new proposal the developer will build five houses, there are no guarantees that the lake will be preserved and supposedly another church will buy the remainder of the property, though it only has 20 parking spaces, a concern raised by the Great Neck Estates Civic League President Derrick Copeland. Councilman Chris Taylor, in whose district this project is located, made a motion to deny the application and was seconded by Council Member Rouse. Before any discussion could take place-which given the substantial changes that the proposal had undergone would have made sense- a substitute motion was made by Council Member Ross-Hammond and seconded by Council member Rosemary Wilson. In making her substitute motion, Council Member Ross-Hammond could not even articulate what her motion was. Mayor Bobby Dyer called on the applicant’s attorney “Eddie, help us out” to reword her motion. The city attorney provided some more changes and her response was “what he said”. The result is that a decision was pushed through without the discussion and consideration it deserved and without the residents given the opportunity to review it. Council Members Henley, Rouse, Taylor and Wooten voted against.

Spring Fling Great Event!

Thank you to all our members for coming out! So great to visit with our neighbors! Thank you to Taste for great food and service! Thanks to our musician Rob Oliver!

As with all our events, they could not happen without all the generous volunteers who make them possible!! Our greeters at the front tables doing their best to keep our records, our wandering raffle money collectors and our great t-shirts sellers all give their time and do their best to make the event a success. Thank you to the Social Committee members and Membership Committee Chair who give their time in planning the events and always looking for ways to improve. We appreciate you sharing your time and your friendliness! Volunteers all- we salute you!

New Ocean Park Merchandise!

We’ve restocked our sunset design tshirts ($25) with some added colors and now children’s sizes ($20)! We also have hats ($25). We still have some of the new merchandise left which will be at Beach Built on Shore Drive. Thank you to Beach Built (next to Froggies) for their hospitality! Cash or credit card will go directly to the Ocean Park Civic League.

Alert: Scammers asking for gift cards!

If you receive an email from President Danny Murphy asking for gift card donations, please ignore. The account has been targeted by scammers. You will note that the email is NOT the official email: president@opcl.org. Below are a copies of the scammer emails.

BAC Meeting Thursday April 18 at OPVRS 3:30: Looking Ahead at Guidelines for Shore Drive

What are your top 3 concerns about development guidelines in Ocean Park? The BAC will take up this discussion and needs to hear from you! Email: communication@opcl.org

While the Shore Drive Corridor Plan and the Shore Drive Design Guidelines may be more familiar, the Urban Land Institute study that they were based on is also available. The study was done in 1997 and does contain outdated information. Several suggested developments: Waterman’s Walk, Fisherman’s Village did not prove viable.

“The questions the panel was asked to address were divided into four major topic areas: market potential, development and marketing strategies, planning and design and implementation. The panel was asked to evaluate potential development in the corridor and how these sectors differed from markets in the oceanfront resort area.” The Executive Summary shows that many of today’s issues were already clear then: “The absence of a vision results in unclear plans for the future and a tendency toward hodgepodge development patterns. The city has many of the tools necessary to implement a plan but in the absence of a clear vision it is hard to find the basis for consistent administrative action and strong political will, especially when pressures to accommodate narrow interests are significant. ” Issues listed for the west side of the bridge (Ocean Park) include: Density, Development Standards, Road and Parking Standards, Future development impact on wetlands.” In 30 years not much change.

The final recommendations called for the city to better control development by requiring compliance with environmental regulations , site design criteria and landscape and parking design regulations. The city “should use these tools aggressively to improve the overall quality of development in the area. The city has the capacity to better communicate with developers regarding design issues and show endeavor to work more closely with the development community to achieve better design outcomes. The Bayfront Advisory Board could be instrumental in this effort.” It draws a parallel between the powerful Resort Advisory Committee and the Bayfront Advisory.

As a part of the Comprehensive Plan update, the Shore Drive Corridor Plan will also be updated. The same consultant firm will address the Shore Drive part of the Comprehensive Plan later next year. In the coming months, the BAC will work toward laying a foundation for that work by reviewing the old plan: its vision, goals and purpose and welcomes input from residents. Many opportunities will be planned for public engagement. The Ocean Park community is invited to review the current guiding Shore Dr. documents included in this post and think about needed changes.

Shore Drive Corridor Plan

Shore Drive Design Guidelines

ULI Study

COVB Codes and Ordinances: Article 17 Shore Drive Overlay District

Baylines: Newsletter from the Bayfront Advisory Commission.

Comments: president@opcl.org

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑